Pizza and Wall Street - The Real Estate Brokerage Bundle

by Kris Berg on September 25, 2008

CIMG9679

I have an idea. I know it’s a little out there, but difficult times call for innovation.

A lot has been written lately about how the current real estate brokerage model is broken. What went wrong? The answer may lie on Wall Street. And the solution may lie in our ability to start thinking a little more like Pizza Hut.

The traditional real estate brokerage is big. The broker provides large, shiny offices — many of them scattered throughout Your City. Where the office used to be necessary to do business, back in the days when the customer came to the service provider, now real estate is in the home delivery business. Computer wielding home buyers and sellers search the thousands of on-line menus from the thousands of on-line storefronts, rarely knowing or caring from which street the drivers are dispatched.

Yet we continue to have the shiny office buildings. The big brokerage model operates off of small margins. A three to five percent profit is generally considered a success. To increase profit, you must increase volume or reduce expenses, or a combination of the two. Duh. But in a business where virtually anyone can be a pizza, all of the pizzas tend to be treated the same. The thin-crust, unseasoned new agents and the stuffed-crust experienced ones all appear on the same menu and at roughly the same price to the consumer.

The problem is that the cost of goods to the brokerage are not the same. The experienced, stuffed-crust variety involves more dough. These agents command higher commission splits, because they bring in more orders and they are in limited supply. Every pizza joint wants them on the menu, which further drives up the their cost and reduces the broker’s margin. And here is the paradox. The newer agents are traditionally on a much higher split with establishment, which means they are really the product being pushed. A thin-crust offering may only attract one hungry customer a year, but with the margin being so great, the temptation is to carry the greatest possible inventory of these products at all times, even though they may not sell as often — or at all.

There is a cost to carrying a large inventory. You need to manage it and account for it. You need someplace to put it. You need a bigger staff to oversee the operation. You need big, shiny office buildings.

And here is where Wall Street comes in. The brokerage model has been bundling their pizzas. This paper has become high risk. The newer stated-income agents who may never reach maturity are packaged with the full-doc, lower risk, lower reward experienced agents. And now the market has shifted. The riskier investments in the portfolio are defaulting. The solid investments continue to perform but their numbers are not as great, so the company is on the verge of needing a bailout. But, a bailout only makes sense if the fundamentals that got us here are reconsidered. A bailout only makes sense if the business model is retooled.

It may be too late for the industry giants, but there may be room for their smaller competition. What if you were only to carry A paper? What if you focused on the more secure, less labor and capital intensive stuffed-crust product? You will make less profit per unit, but you will sell more. It is less risky, and you will reduce costs. The experienced agents don’t need big shiny offices, company-provided computer banks, office voice mail, canned web sites, and an expensive, over-sized oven full of weekly training and mentoring meetings. They come with their own toppings.

Where does that leave the sub-primers? Maybe, the industries giants could rethink their roles. Before an agent gets his license, he must pay for his required courses and he must pay his license application fees. Why, then, can’t the new agents be expected to continue the process of investing in their training and their success outside of the broker model? I can’t walk into Qualcomm with a formal education in art history (or no formal education at all) and get a job on the condition that they teach me all about electrical engineering; I have to come armed with the knowledge and tools. I am expected to pay for my education, and they in turn will pay me to produce.

I am willing to bet that there are countless entrepreneurial real estate experts out there who would gladly provide real estate job training for a fee. And I know first hand that Best Buy would be delighted to sell each of them their own computers, Staples their own office supplies, and a boat load of independent vendors their own tech and non-tech coaching and support. Then, instead of the brokerage having to continue to operate as a bloated, full-service, fully stocked training camp, they could focus on a cost-effective home delivery approach. After all, this is really what the customers want.
Creative Commons License photo credit: Mr Wabu

{ 1 trackback }

8DollarFarming blog » Weekend Reading 9.27.08
09.27.08 at 1:08 am

{ 9 comments… read them below or add one }

1

Jay Valento - Long Beach real estateNo Gravatar 09.25.08 at 8:38 am

I only go in the office to pick up mail and collect a commission check after a client has purchased or sold a property. I don’t need a fax machine, voice mail or anything else. Of course, our office meetings once a month are educational and fun…but the desire to be associated with a big shiny office space is not.

As an internet savvy agent and independent contractor, my focus is on our clients and how to create a user experience online and in person that provides them with the best service. Traditional brokerages can dump their shinny offices, review files online through planetre.com and answer agent questions by phone, instant message, text message or email.

2

Ken BrandNo Gravatar 09.25.08 at 8:45 am

I’d like to order a Quad Meat, Triple Cheese, A to Z Veggie, 62″ Stuffed Crust Mega Monster.

Well said. You’ve identified the opportunity and solution. Who will build and fund it.

It’s near impossible to get big brokers to destroy and reinvent what made them. The fear of loss or failure is too scary, people are hanging by thread now as it is. Franchise folks can’t promote the logic, they are too entrenched and invested in their national models and delivery. Most likely a retro fit would only limp, something from “the ground up new” would be the way to go…but as you’ve shared, it’d take lot’s of dough, iron will and laval like passion to to fund, build and launch . It’d work though, with the right leadership, vision and definition.

Rock ON Kris.

3

Greg CooperNo Gravatar 09.25.08 at 11:52 am

Yes. Yes. Yes. Thank goodness another voice that people listen to saying out loud what has been obvious for some time now. I fear, though that the only way some big, shiny business models will shrink will be if economics crush them into it.

Oh yes and make mine the seafood pizza for pickup please…that is if it’s ok with Susan and Randy. Where’s Chef Jay T. when you need him? (sorry…perhaps it’s just too inside…feel free to zap me if you need to…)

4

Kris BergNo Gravatar 09.25.08 at 12:39 pm

Thanks for the comments, everyone. Greg - I liked and appreciated the inside joke. Of course, being a cyber-space squandering retard, it figures I would enjoy such distractions. :)

5

SvenNo Gravatar 09.25.08 at 2:55 pm

I think the big issue here is that the big-shiny buildings aren’t in place because that’s what it takes to run the business. They are in place to attract new business. If every office closed and the entire real estate industry was run from home, it would function just fine, but the businesses that had the shiny buildings would attract more customers. The first condo I ever bought was me just walking into a Remax office because it was the most obvious real estate office in the neighborhood. I looked at 3 condos, made an offer on one, bought it, and the agent probably had less than 10 hours invested when all was said and done. Maybe another 5 hours that he spent screwing things up…

Real estate offices, like mortgage brokers, car dealerships, banks, financial investment firms, etc… (sales oriented companies) can handle essentially an infinite amount of business, so they invest most of their resources into getting new clients. Businesses that are more service oriented like accountants, engineering companies, machine shops, etc… are limited in how much service they can offer by how many resources they have. They can operate with more discreet places of business.

6

JakobNo Gravatar 09.26.08 at 1:34 pm

Nice insight Sven. Hadn’t thought about it that way.

I think tho that the shiny office building as a way of getting customers has been replaced by the sexy web site.

7

BobNo Gravatar 09.27.08 at 1:04 pm

I left a big shiny brokerage that is Wall Street traded.

I am curious - what benefit do they provide in today’s market for an established agent?

When the market tightens, the first thing they do is cut back on company marketing. What would be “a cost-effective home delivery approach” for these guys?

8

Matthew KellyNo Gravatar 09.27.08 at 6:33 pm

Your right! We should all think a more like Pizza Hut.

When I was a kid, there were Pizza Huts everywhere. Now…I can’t tell you where the closet Pizza Hut is but I certainly have there phone number saved in my blackberry.

9

Kris BergNo Gravatar 09.28.08 at 7:30 pm

J - I concur.
B - I am going to assume that your questions are rhetorical, because I think the answer, like my latest fixer-upper sale, involves taking it down to the studs.
M - I have the local joint on my speed dial, but Pizza Hut is in my Favorites folder. Ah — the Internet rears its head again!

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word