Here I go, mixing my metaphors again!
We were discussing average market times with a seller yesterday. In any market, setting reasonable expectations is key when preparing a client for the process of listing and selling a home. And in any market, this is always a challenge.
Our message these days is that the real estate market is one of extremes. Homes will sell fairly quickly if priced and staged properly, or they will take a very long time to sell and ultimately at a lower price; there is not a big market for average. “Sure, average times are 75 days, but my home is not average,” we often hear. The flip side to this argument was the one we heard yesterday. “Sure, anyone can sell their home quickly if they want to give it away!”
This has always been our cue to chime in with the latent demand speech. In business speak, latent demand is an environment where the demand for a particular product can not be met by existing suppliers. In my traffic engineering engineering days, latent demand was always a consideration. There may be a plethora (yes, we used that word a lot) of motorists wanting to go directly from Point A to Point B, but no road exists. Build it and they will come. In real estate, there are still many, many people who would like to purchase a home, but the home which is right for them is not currently among those offered for sale.
Latent demand as it relates to the home buyer can be thought of as the fence sitter. These buyers are far greater in number than the buyers who will come later. They have accumulated like water at the dam, and the water upstream and on its way is not nearly so deep. Fail to catch a fish from this pool, and your chances later on are significantly diminished.
Or, think about latent demand this way. If you have ever braved the shopping mall on Black Friday, you know that the consuming throngs line up twelve deep at 6:00 AM, anxiously braced for the big opening. Each Gold Card-toting shopper is eagerly awaiting their opportunity to compete for the offerings, to be the first to find the perfect apricot chenille robe and at a bargain. Once Nordstom unbolts the front doors, the waiting mob will stream in, and they will swiftly either make their purchases or decide to come back another weekend, because the robes were too expensive or just flat-out ugly.
The rest of the day will see a steady stream of shoppers arriving late. Each new person through the door will be a new opportunity to unload that hideous housecoat, but it’s a numbers game, and having failed to capitalize on the first wave of opportunity, chances that someone will suddenly breeze through the door wanting exactly what you are offering are significantly diminished. You might move the inventory, or you might have to move it to the sales rack. Now the next trickle of shoppers sees your mark-down, yet the sense of urgency has passed. Why hasn’t anyone bought it? Is it really that ugly? Will it be offered for less next week if I’m just patient? This is where, in San Diego, they all decide to go to the beach.
Now, let’s assume that next year you still have a population of consumers wanting their bargain intimate apparel, but most of them no longer have Gold Cards; it’s something about a mortgage crisis. And a recession. They can’t afford the inventory any longer, but they would still really like to buy something. Even the people who can afford the offerings are being a little more thoughtful about their purchase. No one wants to see their new duds on the discount rounder next week.
When the store opens, a crowd is still at the door, but it is a little thinner. They don’t rush in and out with their purchases anymore, but they linger. And they have been waiting longer. They are “just looking,” looking for an opportunity and waiting for the perfect product. Why settle for ugly apricot when a new delivery of candy apple red might be on the next truck? The store gets crowded, a log-jam of sorts, but the flow of new customers arriving throughout the day is more of a trickle. Too many purchased last year when they were able and when they were caught up in the buying frenzy. They are all at the beach.
The bottom line is that there is still demand for the product, but the demand is latent, and most existing suppliers are not yet in a position to meet this demand. There is still a market for our hypothetical bathrobe; the consumers are the market, and several things have to happen before they check out at the register. First and foremost, the product has to be affordable. With fewer options for payment, Nordstrom is starting to look a lot like Neiman Marcus to the buyer on a budget. Second, there has to be a perception of value. Value can be a discounted price, superior quality, or a combination of the two. Finally, there has to be a shift in the attitudes of the shoppers, and this will come with time. It is understandable to question the quality of the dining experience at an empty restaurant, and people will be more inclined to whip out their checkbooks when others moving toward the check-out line.
Our real estate market has effectively been Closed for Inventory. We have been closed while we take stock, restructure our pricing, and reconsider our merchandising. We have an accumulation of latent demand knocking at the door. “Sure, anyone can sell their home quickly if they want to give it away.” And, anyone can sell their home quickly if they position it properly, with proper pricing and presentation. Yet, if you fail to appeal to the latent demand quickly, you may find your home on the discount rack.








{ 1 trackback }
{ 10 comments… read them below or add one }
I like the observation about perceived value. Value is the #1 thing that will sell me a house.
I’d be curious to know your thoughts about starting low in order to get multiple offers? Stage sort of a mini auction on your house. People might be willing to pay more when they see many other people interested and a perceived value. And you will likely get a higher offer than if you started high and sat, and sat, and sat.
Would you recommend this?
Jakob,
It’s a delicate balancing act, really. In this market, we are finding that simply pricing on the money tends to generate multiple offers. I would never recommend under pricing – ever. But, if you start too high with the expectation that buyers will want to negotiate, you have very little chance of generating enthusiasm from a large crowd. That is, unless you are so truly unique and sought after that you can get away with it. On the other hand, it happened recently where we had a home we knew would be well received, we priced it higher than recent comps but within reason, and the seller received three offers within four days. Needless to say, if they had over-priced, they would have been absent this competition and the result would have been less favorable.
I guess the bottom line is that pricing is an art form, and the seller and the agent have to have a deep and accurate knowledge of their specific market and of buyer mentality in that market.
How about a different perspective: “Sure you can buy a house today. I mean if you really, really don’t like money.”
There is latent demand from sellers for buyers who still want to pay yesterday’s over-speculation (25% YOY appreciation) prices. And these stubborn sellers ain’t budging. It’s just funny because back in 2006, I was telling sellers to drop their prices 15% and their house would sell. Many of those houses are still on the market because they didn’t want to, and the funny thing is they are now asking for 15-20% less. If only they listened. In today’s market, offering a property 20% below comparable listings is a great way to sell it, but in a down market, that same 20% drop is likely to occur for all the other listings over the next 8 months anyway.
In other words, too many people could have gotten out with more if they just reacted sooner, and the same is true today. Changes in real estate momentum are historically slow, and we are at the highest % rate of YOY price drops ever. Even if this is the worst it will get, prices are likely to continue to drop another at least 5-10% before stopping. Personally, I can see at least another 20% shedding before things grind to a halt.
If you want to time a bottom, wait till sales volume hasn’t changed or goes up YOY. (don’t look month-to-month, you’ll just be thrown off by seasonal changes) This will tell you that buyers are finally happy with the prices sellers want, and we can start to see prices stabilize.
Basically, I’m saying I agree
Sven – All that.
Kris –
Wow! This post really nails it for what I have been seeing. I am currently working with several “latent” buyers who are well-qualified and ready to go, but the inventory just isn’t there. The very few properties that are coming on the market in good condition, priced right, and are not a short sale, are turning into bidding wars! The rest of the homes are just sitting, while the sellers continue to want 2005 to come back!
Pricing really is an art – you don’t want to recommend too low a price, but if it is over-priced it will linger and the seller will eventually get substantially less!
Vicki -
Dang! Your comment should have been the post. Much more succinct! We are truly telling a tale of two cities these days, and at the risk of sounding like a broken record, it is mediocrity that is paying the price.
Kris,
You didn’t mention the people afraid of “giving their house away”. I can’t tell you how many times we listed a house dead on for pricing (no bargain, just priced right) and it sat there, even though the owners felt that they were giving it away.
I think everyone is trying to avoid being ripped off, either buying too high or selling too low!
Tara,
If they were priced right, I guarantee they would have sold. Pricing “right” means asking for what people are willing to pay. I’m positive someone would take a house immediately sight unseen for $100,000 anywhere in San Diego. (note I said house, I know some condos are listed for < 100k) A house west of the 5 south of the merge and north of downtown in any condition would probably sell overnight if they asked for $300k or less. These are extremes though. If the house isn’t selling at a price, the most probable answer is because they are asking for too much.
I think the message here is waiting for prices to come up or waiting for that mystery buyer to finally come along is NOT a winning strategy. Just keep dropping the price and someone will buy it. That way you can pass on your property to someone who is in for a long term investment and get out before prices go down more which is the most likely outcome in this situation.
Me, I’m still waiting for someone to buy my Google stock for $650 a share. I mean it used to sell for $750, I priced it right, and I swear there’s got to be a buyer out there for it.
(just kidding, I dumped my Google stock at the peak)
Dear Sven,
I don’t agree that is always true. We have a less than 5% absorption rate and there are houses that are in neighborhoods that only have one sale per 6-9 month period. While there is a low water mark for every house where ANYONE would buy it, I would not be serving my clients’ best interest to advise them to price it excessively below market value.
Our over $1M market is slow and we have a house that SHOULD be priced at about $1.2M. It is priced at $999K. We could just keep dropping it until SOMEONE would agree to buy it OR we can wait until the right buyer who is qualified to buy it enters the market. The person who will buy this house may not be looking today, and asking our client to drop it to $750K to satisfy my need for a quick paycheck is not fulfilling MY fiduciary responsibility.
Now, I DO have people who should drop their prices due to their circumstances and a NEED to sell in today’s market, BUT if I am truly looking out for my clients best interests, I need to weigh the market-vs-their time line to sell, and price it at a point that will attract the most buyers possible.
I think we’re saying the same thing Tara. But my take is that the reason we only have 5% absorption is because average prices are too high considering likely depreciation and rent-to-mortgage ratios.
This is the benchmark I use, and it proves true historically as a middle point for real estate swings:
If with a 20% down payment and good credit financing, your mortgage payment + property tax = rent, you are at the mark that real estate historically (till just the last 7 years) has pinned itself too. On top of that, you can factor in expected short term appreciation or depreciation. So, in today’s market of deprecation, a property’s true value is actually below the equation because you have to factor in some loss in value. The reason things were so far past the ratio in the last few years was because of historically high appreciation. (due to CDO’s, loose lending standards, speculation, etc…)